Cleanse 2

Posted Sep 5, 2009, 9:34:23 AM UTC

 Done in 2008.

Post a comment

Please login to post comments.

Comments

  • Sep 5, 2009, 5:30:00 PM UTC
    That looks really neat - I especially like the way you've shaded it - but the file is so huge I can't see more than a section of it at a time. I feel like I'm missing the impact of the piece because I can't see the whole thing at once.
    • Sep 5, 2009, 8:47:16 PM UTC
      Thank you for letting me know about that problem! I'll give that a check now. <3
    • Sep 5, 2009, 9:51:33 PM UTC
      I have now changed it into JPEG format. Would that work better for you?

      Apologies again for the technical glitch. Being a dial up /F5 combo-er, they all fail-to-load equally. Corky Smile
      • Sep 6, 2009, 11:23:29 PM UTC
        That does load faster, but the problem is more the number of pixels. It looks like it's over 1000 pixels each way. I have a fairly large screen and that still goes off the edges of my display.
        • Sep 7, 2009, 1:46:43 AM UTC
          Hmm, that is bizarre. I do everything at 550pixels shortest way, except in some circumstances 450. So I'm really surprised to hear that it turns up size of elephant at some other people's computers.

          May I ask what browser you are using and what is your resolution?

          Again thank you so much for letting me know. This would be fun to figure out. =D
          • Sep 8, 2009, 9:40:27 PM UTC
            I'm using Safari, I don't know if that makes a difference in display. When I open the picture in its own window, it says it's 1312x1832 pixels! Maybe it's the dpi?
            • Sep 9, 2009, 12:50:03 AM UTC
              312x1832 pixels!!! O_O

              WHOA. Thank you for letting me know! I will certainly have to look into that. I know that I use massive dpi, but this is ridiculous. I'm weirded out actually, need to check upon how that happened.

              But thank you so much for letting me know. YOu have no idea how grateful I am.