Comment 14641

Parent Comment

Sep 25, 2005, 5:06:42 AM UTC
I'm not that much into digital art, but here's my 2 cents anyway
I think I love the last piece (with the wings) the most. The composition is beautiful, the colours and wings seem ethereal, but the longer you look the more you see.
I think the first pic is a bit too 'crude' (I hope that's the right word), the lines could be a bit finer. I still love Link's face there (and let's not forget the fact he's shirtless Wink ).
The second pic is too focused on his face and takes away a bit of all the movement that's evident in the other works.

I'd love to see more!

Comment ID 14641

[Art] Shirtless Link
Sep 25, 2005, 9:32:31 AM UTC on [Art] Shirtless Link
Wow thank you for the detailed comments. If you were saying that Art thumbnail is the crude one, then I agree. (i'm not quite sure which one you were talking about).

Are you saying that this latest one Art thumbnail is the one too focused on his face? I like the fact that the focus is on the upper part of the picture instead of the whole body.

Anyway, thank you again for the comments Eleanora.

Replies

  • Oct 3, 2005, 1:05:07 PM UTC
    With the first one and meant the big pic, so it's just the other way around Smile It find it a bit crude because of the lines you use to define the arms and face. The lines of the arms seem to me a bit too thick in comparison with the ethereal colours and the elfish character of Link (btw, is he an elf?, I can't remember...)Maybe you could make the lines a bit thinner and skecthier? Otherwise, I still think it's a beautiful pic! It's very sensual and the colours are lovely, just as in the other pics.

    So the first small pic is the pic I think is a bit too focused on the face, which makes it less full of movement then the other two works.

    I hope I've made it clearer now Smile
    • Oct 3, 2005, 4:12:31 PM UTC
      wow really, you think this one is the crude one? I think there might be a few lines where it's too dark/thick and it's causing a bit of distraction.

      Thanks for clarifying. Your comments are helpful.